|
|
|
|
|
SELECTION OF VIEW-GRAPS |
|
re: culture „maps“ and „turns“ |
|
|
|
Culture Navigation and Reference Rooms: |
|
A
Futuristic „Out-look“ |
|
Questioning the next turn in Culture and
„CyberCulture“ – What will happen after the „linguistic-“ and „iconic turn“
? |
|
|
|
Heiner Benking |
|
Independent Facilitator and Futurist |
|
Associate, Millennium Project, Berlin CoLab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordnungs -, Orientierungs-, und Sinnkrise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spacial versus Spatial: |
|
|
|
Part I - Setting Common Frames of Reference |
|
Part II - Spacial Knowledge Maps and Knowledge
Models |
|
|
|
Part III- Panoramic Thinking and End of This
Journey |
|
|
|
Heiner Benking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://newciv.org/cob/members/benking/knowmap.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
People feel fine with icons (images) and symbols, but when Peirce in
his sign theory introduced something in-between what he called index they
are somehow destabilized and frightened - not able to believe in the either
- or world of words or metaphoric pictures. |
|
|
|
Just
for the exercise we want to test Peirce's index here by considering his
third category a spacial map or model. This would create room for
communication and sensations when linking and merging of realities and
bridge the media breaks. This in-betweening is further explored in … |
|
|
|
from
chapter: Profound Ignorance and In-Between |
|
|
|
Spacial versus Spatial – Part III : |
|
Panoramic Thinking and End
of This Journey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notizen